Vasipalli Madan Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/6105/2018 · 2025-07-08
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11857 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11857 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010138642018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6105/2018 Between:
1. VASIPALLI MADAN MOHAN REDDY, S/O KONDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC.CONTRACTOR RIO GUDLADONA EAST, KALIGIRI MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA.
2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR /DISTRICT PROGRAM OFFICER, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KALIGIRI MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
5. THE ADDITIONAL PROGRAM OFFICER, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, KALIGIRI MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction one more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order issued vide Rc.No.A7/110/H.R.Ce11/2013 dated 14.11.2017 by the 3rd Respondent removing the Petitioner as a field assistant for Gudladona East Grama Panchayath, Kaligiri Mandal SPSR Nellore District as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NARESH REDDY CHINNOLLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M S R CHANDRA MURTHY
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP)
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction one more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the
order issued vide Rc.No.A7/110/H.R.Ce11/2013 dated 14.11.2017 by the 3rd Respondent removing the Petitioner as a field assistant for Gudladona East Grama Panchayath, Kaligiri Mandal SPSR Nellore District as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and pass ....”
2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader and Standing Counsel appearing for respondents are in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 6105 of 2018
09.07.2025
Mjl /*