Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118543 (ALL)

BRIJESH KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.

FAPL/41/2021 · 2025-01-16

Om Prakash Shukla, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2692-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 41 of 2021 Appellant :- Brijesh Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Onkar Nath Pandey,Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and perused the material placed on record 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that he does not have any instructions from his client to pursue this case despite repeated communications. 3. In view thereof, it appears that the appellant does not want to prosecute this case. 4. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.] Order Date :- 16.1.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench