IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No.165/2022 Date of Decision: 11th July, 2025. Dr. Pyare Lal Sud .....Appellant Versus Vivek Sharma …..Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral). Learned counsel for the respondent submits that insofar as the decretal amount, in the case at hand, is concerned, the same stands either paid to him or deposited in the Registry of the learned trial Court. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he would have no objection, if in case, an appropriate application is filed by the respondent for withdrawal of the amount lying deposited in the Registry of the learned trial Court. 3. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the respondent submits that decree, in the case at hand, 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES 2 stands duly satisfied, insofar as the respondent, is concerned. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant, in the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, seeks permission to withdraw the instant appeal. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 11th July, 2025 (Gaurav Rawat)