DEEP NARAIN MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/601/2025 · 2025-01-24
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118527 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118527 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4875-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 601 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deep Narain Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Shri Akhilesh Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel has instructions to inform the Court that the reason why earlier the sale deed was not registered is the petitioner did not submit the sale deed at the allotted slot. Without entering into this controversy, we direct the petitioner to appear before the respondent no. -3 -Sub Registrar, Sadar, Ayodhya on any date in the next week whereupon the respondent no. 3 shall do the needful, as per law without further delay. Writ petition is disposed of . Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench