Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118501 (PNJ)

MUKESH KUMAR CONTRACTOR v. PARDEEP DAHIYA AND ORS

COCP/2165/2024 · 2025-03-18

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-2165 263 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Mukesh Kumar Mr. Pardeep Dahiya CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, instructions, submits regards claim of the petitioner and the payment in terms thereof shall be released within 02 weeks from today. 2. not press the present petition. 3. 4. 5. stand disposed of 6. aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum 165-2024 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date Mukesh Kumar Contractor VERSUS Pardeep Dahiya & ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr. Navneet Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Gaur, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel representing instructions, submits that the speaking order has been passed as regards claim of the petitioner and the payment in terms thereof shall be released within 02 weeks from today. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if an stand disposed of. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 2165-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.03.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Navneet Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Gaur, Addl. A.G., Haryana. representing the respondents, on that the speaking order has been passed as regards claim of the petitioner and the payment in terms thereof shall be released within 02 weeks from today. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does Dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum , on that the speaking order has been passed as regards claim of the petitioner and the payment in terms thereof shall In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does y, shall also in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum SANJAY GUPTA 2025.03.19 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document COCP-2165 of Rs.50,000/ petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on date of listing of revival application. 7. by the respondent remedy, in accordance with law. 18.03.2025 sanjay 165-2024 (O&M) [2] of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on date of listing of revival application. It is also made clear that as regards the deductions made by the respondents, if any, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail its remedy, in accordance with law. 2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first It is also made clear that as regards the deductions made , if any, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail its HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the the first It is also made clear that as regards the deductions made , if any, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail its SANJAY GUPTA 2025.03.19 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document