SUSHIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/702/2025 · 2025-01-21
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118487 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118487 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3693
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 702 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devanshu Pratap Singh,Akshay Singh,Arshad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Sri Akshay Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the representation of the petitioner has already been decided by the respondents.
2. In light of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 21.1.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench