OKILI SRINIVASULU REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANHDRA PRADESH
WP/8334/2020 · 2025-08-04
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11844 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11844 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010138622020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8334/2020 Between:
1. OKILI SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O. OKILI CHINNA SUBBA REDDY, AGE 48 OKILI SRINIVASULU REDDY S/O. OKILI CHINNA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. BALASINGAYAPALLI VILLAGE, CHENNURU MANDAL, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANHDRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMRAVATHI. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMRAVATHI.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINNACHOWK POLICE STATION, KADAPA, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINNACHOWK POLICE STATION, KADAPA,
2
YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
5. THE SUBINSPECTOR CHINNACHOWK POLICE STATION, KADAPA, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT THE SUB-INSPECTOR CHINNACHOWK POLICE STATION, KADAPA, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5 in interfering with the matters of civil dispute pertains to the construction of house in the site admeasuring Ac. 0.04 cents consisting Door No.41/140-1-1-3, Bharati Bar Street, Sankarapuram, Kadapa, YSR (Kadapa) District as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violating Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to 5 not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to the construction of house in the site admeasuring Ac. 0.04 cents consisting Door No.41/140-1-1-3, Bharati Bar Street, Sankarapuram, Kadapa, YSR (Kadapa) District IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8334/2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5 in interfering with the matters of civil dispute pertains to the construction of house in the site admeasuring Ac. 0.04 cents consisting Door No.41/140-1-1-3, Bharati Bar Street, Sankarapuram, Kadapa, YSR (Kadapa) District as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violating Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to 5 not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to the construction of house in the site admeasuring Ac. 0.04 cents consisting Door No.41/140-1-1-3, Bharati Bar Street, Sankarapuram, Kadapa, YSR (Kadapa) District…”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the respondent- police are not interfering in the matter, since the subject matter is of civil in nature.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
4
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.08.2025 UPS
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.8334 of 2020
Dated.05.08.2025
UPS
47