NADEEM AHMAD AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/552/2025 · 2025-01-27
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118416 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118416 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5105-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 552 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nadeem Ahmad And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar,Ranjeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certioari to quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 02.07.2019 lodged by the opposite party no.3 in Case Crime No.366/2019, under Sections 147, 353 I.P.C., at Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition".
Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the investigation has been concluded and the charge-sheet has been prepared by the Investigating OfÏcer. Since the charge-sheet has been prepared by the Investigating OfÏcer, it is presumed that sufÏcient evidence has been collected and filed with the Charge-sheet before the Trial Court for its evaluation, therefore, this Court feels it to be inappropriate to interfere at this stage. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Competent Court for raising their challenge to the Charge-sheet.
Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Rahul Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench