SHAILENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHIEF SECY. GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/641/2025 · 2025-01-30
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118415 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118415 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6456-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 641 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shailendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Govt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard counsel for the parties.
2. Earlier petition was filed in the name of the firm and this petition has been filed in the name of the Proprietor and in the same vein the name of the Proprietor is also there.
3. The petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition seeking payment of dues for the work allegedly done but the court declined to entertain the same as it involved disputed question of facts leaving it open to him to seek other remedy.
4. Thereafter as informed by Shri K. Vishwakarma Advocate holding brief of Shri Rishabh Kapoor, counsel for Jal Nigam, the petitioner preferred a civil suit for the said purpose. Now this petition has been filed arising out of same contract seeking release of the security money which was to the tune of Rs.75,000/-. Copy of plaint of the suit allegedly filed by the petitioner has been placed before us which refers to the security money also. Copy of the plaint has been shown to the petitioner's counsel. He says that his client has not informed him about it at all. Copy of the plaint is taken on record. So is the order dated 08.05.2017 passed in the earlier writ petition.
5. This writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Order Date :- 30.1.2025/Pks [Brij Raj Singh,J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench