[2025:JHHC:13661] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3717 of 2025 ------ Deva Diggi @ Daso Diggi, aged about 29 years, S/o Late Mora @ Mara Diggi, Resident of Village- Jomro, Tola- Gutusai, P.O. & P.S.- Karaikela, Dist.- West Singhbhum (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-06-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.514 of 2023 arising out of Karaikela P.S. Case No.07 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons has committed the murder of Sakri Diggi and Badri Diggi. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that only because the petitioner was having quarrel with the deceased and threatening to kill them, hence, he has been implicated in this case; only on the basis of suspicion. It is then submitted the petitioner has been in custody since 04.07.2023 as is evident from para-17 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that charge has been framed in this case. It is also submitted that so far, no witness has been examined. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.07.2024 passed in B.A. No.286 of 2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Sub Divisional Court, Chakradharpur (Chaibasa) in connection with S.T. Case No.514 of 2023 arising out of Karaikela P.S. Case No.07 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/