BANKE LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/677/2025 · 2025-01-21
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118338 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118338 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3797 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 677 of 2025 Petitioner :- Banke Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Upadhyay,Diksha Tiwari,Saurabh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri A. K. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and the Standing counsel on behalf of the respondents.
2. It has been submitted that the petitioner was working on the post of Collection Peon and superannuated in 2010 after completing 26 years of service. During the period of service the petitioner was entitled for being granted benefit of third Assured Career Progression (ACP) on completion of 26 years' service which was granted to the petitioner only on 22.12.2023. Once the benefit of third ACP has been granted to the petitioner the only grievance which subsists is with regard to grant of arrears to the petitioner.
3. It has been submitted that the petitioner repeatedly made representations to opposite party No.3 but his claim has neither been considered nor decided till date and accordingly after arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall stand redressed in case opposite party No.3 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 1.4.2023, contained in Annexure No.5 to the writ petition, expeditiously.
4. Learned State counsel does not object to the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner.
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No.3 i.e. District Magistrate/Collector, District Shahjahanpur to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 1.4.2023, contained in Annexure No.5 to the writ petition expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy this order is placed before him, in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order and communicate the decision to the petitioner.
6. In case, the representation is decided and it is found that the petitioner is entitled for being granted the arrears, the same shall be paid to him expeditiously but not later than four weeks
from the date of decision of the said representation. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 21.1.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench