SHASHI PRAKASH TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/836/2025 · 2025-01-22
Abdul Moin
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4026 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 836 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shashi Prakash Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Secondary Edu. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Shri P.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State- respondents. No notice is required to be issued to respondent No.7 taking into
consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been working as an ad hoc teacher since long. Subsequent to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.8300 of 2016 In Re Sanjay Singh & Ors vs State of U.P. and Ors dated 26.08.2020 the State Government has issued a Government Order dated 08.07.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-7 to the petition per which such teachers as the petitioner can be considered for being engaged on honorarium basis. The petitioner stakes his claim for benefit of the aforesaid Government Order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.3 which may be
directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.3 then the respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 22.1.2025/prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench