RAMU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/583/2024 · 2025-08-18
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118295 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118295 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48328 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 583 of 2024 Applicant :- Ramu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Komal Prasad Tiwari,Bandana Kumari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Malik Faiyaz Ahmed Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.
3. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following prayer:-
"WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case no.44874/2016 arising out of impugned Charge sheet no.203/2016 dated 28.06.2016 arising out of Case Crime No. 125/2016 under section 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC at police station Gosainganj, District Lucknow also impugned cognizance
order dated 01.10.2016 passed on it, which is pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court no.30, Lucknow with respect of the petitioner on the basis of settlement done between the parties, as contained in Annexure no.1&2 to this petition. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the proceeding of Criminal Case no.44874/2016 arising out of impugned Charge sheet no.203/2016 dated 28.06.2016 arising out of Case Crime No. 125/2016 under section 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC at police station Gosainganj, District Lucknow, pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court no.30, Lucknow with respect of the petitioner, during pendency of this petition."
4. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant
FIR was lodged against the applicants and thereafter the parties sat together and has amicably settled their dispute which has been reduced in writing on 11.01.2024. He added that thereafter the applicants filed the instant application for direction to the trial Court to verify the compromise deed and in compliance of the
order dated 29.05.2025, the verification was done and report has been submitted to this Court vide
order dated 12.06.2025. He submits that further criminal proceeding in the instant matter would amount to harassment and thus the instant criminal proceeding arising out of Case Crime No.125 of 2016 may be quashed.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the contention of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicable settled their dispute and the opposite party no. 2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped.
6. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid.
7. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the
learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 11.01.2024 and said compromise has been verified on 12.06.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal case relating to Case Crime No.125 of 2016.
8. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 11.01.2024 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgements of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003)4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation[2008)9 SCC 677]; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs.
State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC 466.
9. Accordingly, criminal proceedings with regard to Criminal Case No.44874 of 2016, arising out of Case Crime No. 125 of 2016 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC, Police Station Gosainganj, District Lucknow, are hereby quashed.
10. The compromise shall be part of this order.
11. The application is allowed accordingly.
12. Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 18.8.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench