HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 561 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 486 of 2024, under Sections 61(2) Ka, 103(1) and 3(5) BNS, P.S. Kotwali Sahar, District Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled against 3 unknown persons, subsequently the statement was recorded by the co-accused wherein it was stated that at the instance of the applicant two person were engaged for committing the offence. As against the applicant the allegations are that he was contacted and that he adviced and thereafter held meeting with two persons who committed the actual offence. 4. It is argued that 4 of the co-accused had been enlarged on bail. The criminal antecedents of the applicant has been explained in rejoinder affidavit in paragraph 25 and in all these cases he is on bail. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances and the nature of allegations levelled against the applicant as recorded above and the fact that 4 of the co accused have been enlarged on bail, however, without commenting Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Verma, Ajeet Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Aditya Prakash, Nadeem Murtaza, Priyam Kumar Singh, Surya Prakash Ramu Mahawat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in custody since 18.8.2024 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Ramu Mahawat be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 561 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench