1 2025:CGHC:14680-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 173 of 2025 Atish Kumar Gorakh (Advocate) S/o Shri Subhashchand Gorakh Aged About 53 Years Caste-Khatik (Schedule Caste), R/o Ward No. 36, Shivaji Nagar, Tikrapara, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Inspector General Of Police (Range) Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Additional Superintendent Of Police (Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe) Sarkanda Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Station House Officer P.S. Ajak, Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Thana In-Charge P.S. Masturi, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Subhash Agrawal S/o Radheshyam Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o Rajkishor Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8 - Suresh Nishad Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Lavar P.S. Masturi District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Praveen Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents No.1 to 6/State : Mr.S.S.Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.03.28 10:45:23 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 27 .03 .2025 1. Heard Mr.Praveen Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr.S.S.Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for respondents No.1 to 6/State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following reliefs: “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner.” 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to direct the respondent authority, the respondent no.6 to register the offence under section schedule caste and schedule tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief that the Hon’ble Court may think just and appropriate may also kindly be granted in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. 4. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu