Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1182 (UTT)

RAJ KUMUD PATHAK AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/73/2025 · 2025-02-21

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 73 of 2023 Raj Kumud Pathak and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….Respondents Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Standing Counsel for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral) Heard and perused file. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the controversy at hand is squarely covered by the judgment dated 28.02.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 223 of 2022, State of Uttarakhand and others Vs. Dinesh Singh, as well as the connected matters. 3. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel. 4. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 28.02.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No. 2 223 of 2022, State of Uttarakhand and others Vs. Dinesh Singh and the connected matters. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 21.02.2025 Avneet/