Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11818 (AP)

Konakondla Raju v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/2957/2025 · 2025-03-21

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Contd..2P.. APHC010137932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2957/2025 Between: Konakondla Raju and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. POTHURAJU MANINDER Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: -2- THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION No.2957 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners were arraigned as A.2, A.3, A.4 and A.5 in Crime No.36 of 2025 of Tadipatri Town Police Station, Anantapuramu District, registered for the alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners 1 and 2 are the parents, petitioner No.3 is the sister of A.1; and petitioner No.4 is the husband of the 3rd petitioner. The learned counsel further submits that on account of marital disputes, the 2nd respondent filed a complaint against her husband and his family members and that the petitioners are staying away from A.1 and the 2nd respondent and the petitioners never interfered with the marital disputes between A.1 and the 2nd respondent. 4. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Station House Officer, Tadipatri Town Police Station, Anantapuramu District, is directed to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha -3- Sanhita, 2023, insofar as the petitioners/A.2 to A.5 are concerned, for the purpose of investigation in connection with Crime No.36 of 2025. 5. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed off. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the criminal petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH. N Dt.21.03.2025 BV