PARLAD KUMAR ALIAS PRAHLAD KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/2204/2021 · 2025-08-27
Ashish Naithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11817 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11817 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:7608
S L. N o. D a t e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No. 2204 of 2021 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioners.
2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, learned counsel for Respondent No.
3.
4. Learned State Counsel would submit that since the Petitioners have been exonerated from the charges, therefore, the present Criminal Writ Petition has rendered infructuous.
5. In view of the above, the present Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashish Naithani, J.) 27.08.2025 Shiksha SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5 aa08b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7 FF0A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2025.08.27 17:58:38 +05'30'
2025:UHC:7608