Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11811 (KAR)

THIPPANNA HOSAMANI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

CCC/200038/2025 · 2025-04-16

K Natarajan, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2353-DB CCC No. 200038 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 200038 OF 2025 BETWEEN: THIPPANNA HOSAMANI S/O DEVAPPA AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURAL LABOUR, R/O MADDARKI VILLAGE, TQ: SHAHAPUR DIST: YADGIRI – 585223. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI VEERSHETTY B KONDAMAPALLI, ADV.) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BENGLAURU – 560001. …PROFORMA PARTY 2. D. SUSHILA, I.A.S., THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, YADGIRI DIST: YADGIRI – 585201. 3. DR. HAMAPANNA SAJJAN THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER YADGIRI – 585201. 4. SRI UMAKANT HALLAD TAHSILDAR AND SECRETARY Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2353-DB CCC No. 200038 of 2025 CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (LAND GRANT) SHAHAPUR DIST: YADGIRI – 585223. …ACCUSED (BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR TENGLI, AGA FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 & R3 IS DEFERRED FOR THE PRESENT; NOTICE TO R4 – SERVED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED RESPONDENT FOR HAVING VIOLATED AND FOR HAVING WILLFULLY DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED 02.08.2024 ISSUED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP NO.200656/2024 AND PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 02.08.2024 passed in W.P.No.200656/2024 by the learned Single Judge of this - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2353-DB CCC No. 200038 of 2025 Court. The operative portion of the said order reads as under: i. “The Writ Petition is allowed. ii. Mandamus is issued directing the respondents to consider the application dated 07.02.2024 submitted by the petitioner at Annexure-A in accordance with law, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.” 2. The learned Additional Government Advocate has filed the counter affidavit sworn by Sri Umakanth, Tahsildar, Shahapur Taluk. The said affidavit is annexed with the endorsement dated 28.11.2024, wherein the petitioner’s representation was considered by the authorities as directed by the learned Single Judge and came to be rejected. 3. In view of the said affidavit and the endorsement dated 28.11.2024, the present contempt proceeding is dropped with a liberty to the - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2353-DB CCC No. 200038 of 2025 petitioner/complainant to challenge the said endorsement, if so advised. Sd/- (K NATARAJAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8 CT: PS