IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 21106/2025 Decided on: 06.01.2026 Jarmo …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General and Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and 3 respectively. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking applicability of Sunder Singh Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 Balo Devi & others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others3 towards pension. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2Civil Appeal No. 6309 of 2017, decided on 08.03.2018 3 Civil Appeal No.4792 of 2022 decided on 18.07.2022 2 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring his representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 06th January, 2026(rohit)