Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118094 (ALL)

SUNITA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/616/2025 · 2025-02-28

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12142-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 616 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunita Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. It is said that post-mortem was conducted on the body of the deceased, however, cause of death could not be ascertained, therefore, viscera was preserved for chemical analysis. The post mortem report dated 20.05.2023 filed today is taken on record. 3. We are now in 2025. If any such vicera report has been received then the District Magistrate, Lucknow should get the same verified and if he finds that in fact viscera report has been received by the police or whosoever is competent in this regard and it discloses any cause of death which may require revisiting of the impugned decision then he shall do the needful as per law. However, if he finds that viscera report has not been received then he shall instruct the concerned to take adequate steps for getting the viscera report at the earliest say within six weeks of receipt of certified copy of this order. Such exercise would be conducted on receipt of such report. However, if the same has been received and it is found that based on cause of death mentioned therein, no benefit is available to the petitioner then the same shall be communicated to the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 28.2.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench