GULAB CHAND RAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND ANOTHER
/617/2025 · 2025-01-24
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118089 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118089 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4827
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 617 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gulab Chand Ram And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya),Sonal Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri R.K. Uyadhyay, learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents and perused the material available on record.
2. The grievances of the petitioners is that he has been ignored for being promoted on the post of Consolidator from the post of Lekhpal on which the petitioners are working.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that the last and final seniority list was issued on 31.01.2022 wherein the claim of the petitioners are figured at Serial Nos. 644 and 643 while the persons at serial Nos. 645, 646, 650, 740, 743 and 787 have been promoted to the post of Consolidator by means of order dated 19.12.2024.
4. He has submitted that there is no adverse material on the service records of the petitioners and also the criteria for promotion is seniority subject to rejection of unfit and accordingly submits that there is no reason as to why the claim of the petitioners could have been ignored.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners substantially redressed in case the respondent no. 2- Commissioner, Consolidation, U.P. Indira Bhawan, Ashok Marg, Lucknow is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 20.12.2024 moved by the petitioner in according with law within a stipulation period of time.
6. Learned Standing Counsel does not oppose the prayer made by the petitioners.
7. In light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 - Commissioner, Consolidation, U.P. Indira Bhawan, Ashok Marg, Lucknow to consider and decide the representation dated 20.12.2024 moved by the petitioner by a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously say within three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him and communicate the decision to the petitioners. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench