BIRDHICHAND S/O SHRI POONAMCHAND @ POONARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSR/175/2024 · 2025-07-31
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11807 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11807 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.175/2024 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 507/2024 Birdhichand S/o Shri Poonamchand @ Poonaram, Utshav Vatika Ke Pas, Beawar, district Ajmer (At Present Confined In District Jail, Beawar) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2. Lokesh Sharma S/o Shri Gopal Krishan Sharma, R/o Halwai Gali Manak Dangi Ke Makan Ke Samne, Beawar District Ajmer ----Complainant-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Trivedi, Adv., for Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order 31/07/2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the application for suspension of sentence. The revision petition has been filed against the order dated 18.04.2023 passed by the learned trial Court in Criminal Case No.931/2017, whereby, the accused-petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to undergo 1 year simple imprisonment along with fine of Rs.2,30,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo three months simple imprisonment. An appeal
(2 of 3) [SOSR-175/2024 in CRLR-507/2024] was preferred by the accused against the said order which was dismissed
by
the
learned
appellate
Court
while affirming/modifying the order of the learned trial Court.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner was on bail during trial and is presently behind the bars. Learned counsel also submits that his financial position is not sound. However, he is ready to deposit the amount as ordered by this Court. Considering the provision of Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and facts and circumstances of the case, this application for suspension of sentence is allowed. The sentence of the accused-applicant namely, Birdhichand S/o Shri Poonamchand @ Poonaram is suspended till final disposal of the revision petition, provided he deposits a sum of Rs.35,000/- by way of Demand Draft in the name of complainant before the learned trial Court and also furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 03.09.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. It is also ordered that the original Demand Draft shall be delivered to the complainant subject to an undertaking to be furnished by the complainant before the learned trial Court to the effect that in case the revision petition is decided against him, he will refund the aforesaid amount along with interest @7% per annum.
(3 of 3) [SOSR-175/2024 in CRLR-507/2024] A copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court for compliance.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /53