IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 303 AYUDHYA PARSHAD PATHAK N.K. BHALLA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE M Present : Mr Mr. Munish Kumar, Amicus Curiae for the respondents. KIRTI SINGH Mr. Saurabh Gautam, Advocate who has been appointed as Amicus Curiae for the petitioner have arrived at a compromise and the sale deed of the disputed property has been executed in favour of 3 view of the aforesaid compromise. Accordingly, the pres Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. High Court Legal Services Authority is directed to pay the fee of both the Amicus Curiae, as per rules. 29.09.2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.851 OF 2005 Date of decision: AYUDHYA PARSHAD PATHAK Versus N.K. BHALLA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH Mr. Saurabh Gautam, Amicus Curiae for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Kumar, Amicus Curiae for the respondents. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (oral) Mr. Saurabh Gautam, Advocate who has been appointed as Amicus Curiae for the petitioner appeared and has submitted that the parties have arrived at a compromise and the sale deed of the disputed property has been executed in favour of 3rd party. He seeks withdrawal of the petition in view of the aforesaid compromise. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. High Court Legal Services Authority is directed to pay the fee of both the Amicus Curiae, as per rules. (RAMESH KUMARI Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 851 OF 2005 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.09.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents RAMESH KUMARI Amicus Curiae for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Kumar, Amicus Curiae for the respondents. Mr. Saurabh Gautam, Advocate who has been appointed as appeared and has submitted that the parties have arrived at a compromise and the sale deed of the disputed property has party. He seeks withdrawal of the petition in ent petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. High Court Legal Services Authority is directed to pay the fee of RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No Mr. Saurabh Gautam, Advocate who has been appointed as appeared and has submitted that the parties have arrived at a compromise and the sale deed of the disputed property has party. He seeks withdrawal of the petition in High Court Legal Services Authority is directed to pay the fee of Jyoti 2025.09.29 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document