Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118039 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR PANDEY and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.

A482/7712/2017 · 2025-09-18

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7712 of 2017 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the applicants to press this application. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The application under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S.,2023 is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. 7. Office is directed to communicate this order to the trial court concerned forthwith. September 18, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saima Khan, Chandra Bhooshan, Ramesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinod Kumar Pandey And Anr. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench