Dasara Prabhakara Subbarayudu, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/8246/2020 · 2025-02-25
Kiranmayee Mandava
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11803 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11803 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010137512020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 8246/2020 Between: Dasara Prabhakara Subbarayudu, ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Heard Sri N. Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, appearing for the respondents.
2. Being aggrieved by the action of the respondents in declaring the preliminary notification issued by the 2nd respondent in Form-VI(a) under Section 11 (1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act No.30 of 2013)
2
vide Ref. G4/497/2019, dated Nil-03-2020, whereby and whereunder the land of the petitioner of an extent of Ac.1-00 Cents in Sy.No.114-1 of Padamara Kandrika Village, Kapileswarapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, in order to allot subject lands to the beneficiaries of the government scheme viz,
“Navaratnalu Pedalandiriki Illu”, the instant Writ Petition is filed.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, has placed on record a copy of the instructions, dated 21.02.2025. A perusal of the same would reflect that the District Collector vide notification dated 24.03.2024 under Section 93(1) of Act.30 of the 2013, has withdrawn the notification issued for land acquisition. It is further stated that an alternate land has been proposed for issuance of house site pattas to the beneficiaries of the scheme.
4. In that view of the matter, it is stated by the learned counsel that no further orders are required to be passed in the present Writ Petition.
5. The said written instructions are placed on record.
6. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date:25.02.2025 MVK
3
196 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION No.8246 of 2020
Date:25.02.2025
MVK