Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118012 (ALL)

SRIRAM YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA THRU.ITS SECY. DEPTT. OF TELE-COMMUNICATIONS MIN. OF COMMUNICATIONS AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/622/2025 · 2025-01-21

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 622 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sriram Yadav Respondent :- Union Of India Thru.Its Secy. Deptt. Of Tele- Communications Min. Of Communications And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Kant Shukla,Pankaj Singh Yadav,Siddharth Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Nidhi Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for Union of India and Ms. Nidhi Singh, learned Counsel for the respondents no.2 and 3. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that privilege leave encashment has not been paid though the petitioner has retired way back on 31.07.2023. 3. Nevertheless, considering the nature of grievance, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the opposite party no.3 to look into the matter, verify the facts and take a decision as regards payment of privilege leave encashment to the petitioner within two months from the date a copy of this order is submitted. Needless to say that if any interest is payable on the said amount, the same shall also be paid as per rules. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench