Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117997 (PNJ)

KULDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/14535/2025 · 2025-03-18

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-14535 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 123 Kuldeep Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. Section 528 of respondent No. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.12.2024 (Annexure P respondents, who are harassing the petitioner. 2. has submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to East, District Ludhiana necessary acti 3. 4. Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent needful shall be done in due course. 14535-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kuldeep Kaur Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. K. S. Hissowal, Advocate for the petitioner. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking direction to respondent No. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.12.2024 (Annexure P-3) and to take appropriate action against the private respondents, who are harassing the petitioner. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the s submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to respondent No. 3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ludhiana East, District Ludhiana to decide the aforesaid representation and take necessary action. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab, Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent needful shall be done in due course. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14535-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.03.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA K. S. Hissowal, Advocate The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking direction to respondent No. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 3) and to take appropriate action against the private respondents, who are harassing the petitioner. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner s submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ludhiana to decide the aforesaid representation and take hika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that the -1- 2025 (O&M) 18.03.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking direction to respondent No. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 3) and to take appropriate action against the private petitioner s submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ludhiana to decide the aforesaid representation and take who is present in State and submits that the MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.03.20 09:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-14535 5. present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. the aforesaid representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of month from today by passing a spea take necessary action, if so required. 18.03.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 14535-2025 (O&M) Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. aforesaid representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of from today by passing a speaking order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if so required. 18.03.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3 to decide aforesaid representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of g order in accordance with law and (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -2- Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the to decide aforesaid representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of one g order in accordance with law and MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.03.20 09:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document