Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117982 (MAD)

THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER v. S. VIJAYA

WA(MD)/691/2025 · 2025-08-06

G R Swaminathan, K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR W.A(MD)Nos.691 to 693, 575, 755 & 729 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4859, 4879, 4880, 4359, 5132, 5011, 10950, 10947, 10948, 10946, 10941 & 10940 of 2025 W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025: 1.The District Revenue Officer cum Additional District Executive Magistrate, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manachanallur, Trichy District. ... Appellants 1 to 3 / Respondents 1 to 3 Vs. Vijaya ... Respondent / Writ Petitioner 1/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed in W.P(MD)No.9786 of 2021 by this Court in order dated 21.12.2023 on the file of this Court and allow this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.N.Ramesh Kumar Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.Saravanan Senior Counsel for M/s.B.Saravanan Associates W.A(MD)No.692 of 2025: 1.The District Revenue Officer cum Additional District Executive Magistrate, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manachanallur, Trichy District. ... Appellants 1 to 3 / Respondents 1 to 3 Vs. R.Rengaraj ... Respondent / Writ Petitioner 2/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed in W.P(MD)No.9783 of 2021 by this Court in order of the learned single Judge dated 21.12.2023 on the file of this Court and allow this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.N.Ramesh Kumar Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.Saravanan Senior Counsel for Mr.D.Kirubakaran W.A(MD)No.693 of 2025: 1.The District Revenue Officer cum Additional District Executive Magistrate, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manachanallur, Trichy District. ... Appellants 1 to 3 / Respondents 1 to 3 Vs. 3/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 Mathialagan.S ... Respondent / Writ Petitioner PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed in W.P(MD)No.9780 of 2021 by this Court in order dated 21.12.2023 on the file of this Court and allow this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.N.Ramesh Kumar Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.Saravanan Senior Counsel for Mr.D.Kirubakaran W.A(MD)No.575 of 2025: 1.The District Revenue Officer cum Additional District Executive Magistrate, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manachanallur, Trichy District. ... Appellants 1 to 3 / Respondents 1 to 3 4/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 Vs. D.Murugesan ... Respondent / Writ Petitioner PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed in W.P(MD)No.9787 of 2021 by this Court in order dated 21.12.2023 on the file of this Court and allow this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.N.Ramesh Kumar Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.Saravanan Senior Counsel for M/s.B.Saravanan Associates W.A(MD)No.755 of 2025: 1.The District Revenue Officer cum Additional District Executive Magistrate, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 5/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 3.The Tahsildar, Manachanallur, Trichy District. ... Appellants 1 to 3 / Respondents 1 to 3 Vs. R.Ravi ... Respondent / Writ Petitioner PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed in W.P(MD)No.9782 of 2021 by this Court in order dated 21.12.2023 on the file of this Court and allow this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.N.Ramesh Kumar Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.Saravanan Senior Counsel for Mr.D.Kirubakaran W.A(MD)No.729 of 2025: 1.The District Revenue Officer cum Additional District Executive Magistrate, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 6/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 3.The Tahsildar, Manachanallur, Trichy District. ... Appellants 1 to 3 / Respondents 1 to 3 Vs. S.Sugumar ... Respondent / Writ Petitioner PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed in W.P(MD)No.9784 of 2021 by this Court in order dated 21.12.2023 on the file of this Court and allow this Writ Appeal. For Appellants : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.N.Ramesh Kumar Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.Saravanan Senior Counsel for Mr.D.Kirubakaran COMMON JUDGMENT Heard both sides. 7/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 2.The State has filed these Writ Appeals challenging the order dated 21.12.2023 passed by the learned single Judge allowing the writ petitions. The writ petitioners were assigned with certain pieces of land. The details are as follows: S. No Assignee Date of Assignment Extent (Hectare) Survey Number 1) Murugesan 25.07.1994 1 216/15 2) Vijaya 27.03.2000 0.71.0 216/18 3) Rengaraj 15.07.1994 1 216/17 4) S.Mathialagan 15.07.1994 1 216/13 5) Sugumar 27.03.2000 0.71.0 216/19 6) Ravi 15.07.1994 1 216/14 3.The assignments were cancelled some 21 years later on the ground that the assigned lands were not brought to cultivation within three years. The learned single Judge concluded that if on this ground the assignments were to be cancelled, a spot inspection must have been held immediately on the expiry of the third year and thereafter cancellation order should have been passed. In this case, the orders were passed belatedly. On this ground, the learned single Judge chose to set aside. We do not want to interfere with the same. 8/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 4.These Writ Appeals stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [G.R.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 05.08.2025 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No MGA 9/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and K.RAJASEKAR, J. MGA W.A(MD)No.691 of 2025 06.08.2025 10/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis