ATTIN SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA TH PRIVATE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/3517/2025 · 2025-12-12
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11796 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11796 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 3517/2025 CM No. 8016/2025
Attin Sharma …..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bupinder Anthal, Advocate.
Vs
Union of India & Ors. .….Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (12.12.2025)
01.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, when pointed out that the title of the writ petition shall also be in the representative capacity instead of being in the name of an individual, as such, seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file fresh one.
02. The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with connected application with liberty as prayed for.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
12.12.2025
Bunty
Serial No. 147 Supplementary List-I Bunty Kumar 2025.12.16 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu