S.M. ABBAS HAIDER @ SAYED MOHAMMAD ABBAS HAIDER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. CANE LKO. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/586/2025 · 2025-01-20
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3274 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 586 of 2025 Petitioner :- S.M. Abbas Haider @ Sayed Mohammad Abbas Haider Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Cane Lko. U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Rastogi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajeev Singh,Sudhanshu Chauhan Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent no.1, Sri Rajeev Singh,
learned counsel for respondent no.2, and Sri Sudhanshu Chauhan, learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4.
2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.
3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization on the post of Assistant Law Officer and for being provided grade pay of Rs.4600 with revised salary of Rs.9300-24800, and further to revise the grade pay of Assistant Law Officer from 27.09.2019 after adjusting the grade pay of the post of Legal Assistant which is already paid to the petitioner since 2009 to 27.09.2019, as well as to pay interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum since 27.09.2019 till date.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection.
5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within three days from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 20.1.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench