Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11792 (AP)

THATHADAPUDI VIJAY KUMAR v. YENUBARI KALPANA @ T.KALPANA

CRP/883/2023 · 2025-06-26

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

■w APHC010137592023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 883 OF 2023 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, CRP aggrieved the Order, dated 19-01-2023 passed the III Additional District Judge Court, Nellore in I.A. No. 323 / 2022 in D.O.P. No.11 / 2022 Between: Thathadapudi Vijay Kumar, S/o Late Prabhakar, aged about 42 yrs, occ. Unemployed, R/o. D.No. 28/5/372, Prasanthi Nagar, Navalakula gardens, SPSR Nellor District. ...Petitioner AND Yenubari Kalpana T Kalpana, W/o T. Vijay Kumar, D/o YenubariJarmiya, aged about 36 years, Occ. Nurse, R/o. Nellipudi Village, Vakadu Mandal, Tirupathi District, Erstwhile SPSR Nellore District. ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition the prayed in the interest of justice that the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in I.A No. 323/2022 in DOP No. 11/2022 dated 19/01/2023 on the file of the 3rd Additional district judge at Nellore pending disposal of main petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: M/S KOPPARTHI SUMATHI The Court made the following: Order APHC010137592023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 883/202.-^ [3505] Between: Thathadapudi Vijay Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Yenubari Kalpana T Kalpana Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT 1.S.ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1.KOPPARTHI SUMATHI The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The III Additional District Judge Court, Nellore. Sri. S.Ashok Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. Kopparthi Sumathi, Advocate [OPUC] V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 3. One CC to 4. The Section Officer 5. Two CD Copies MKP VNA HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 i ORDER CRP 883/2023 11 JUl 2025 •J. rJ' . Current Section DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS