13 Regular IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(7485/2025) IN CM(M) 495/2025 CM(7486/2025) UMER ASHRAF NAHAMI ….. Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Feroz Ahmad, Adv. V/s MST. TANZEELA ….. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge ORDER 17.11.2025 CrlM No. 7485/2025: For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the requirement of filing certified copy of order dated 06.09.2025 is dispensed with. CrlM disposed of. CM(M) No. 495/2025: The petitioner, has challenged order dated 06.09.2025 passed in a petition filed by the respondent against the petitioner under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (hereinafter to be referred as DV Act). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record of the case. P a g e | 2 CM(7485/2025) IN CM(M) 495/2025 CM(7486/2025 A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the same has been passed in exparte and is subject to objections of other side. The petitioner has two options, he can file appeal against the said order under Section 29 of DV Act before the learned Sessions Judge and in the alternative, he has an option to file objections to the Section 12 of DV Act petition and seek variation of order dated 06.09.2025. Without exhausting these remedies, the petitioner cannot invoke extraordinary supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is, therefore, dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedies. (Sanjay Dhar) Judge SRINAGAR 17.11.2025 Aasif