Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117865 (ALL)

SATYA PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR AYODHYA AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/651/2025 · 2025-01-23

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4611-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 651 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate/Collector Ayodhya And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Pandey,Kuldeep Pandey,Shivangi Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The petitioner is aggrieved by a construction being undertaken by the private opposite parties who are co-sharers of the land in question of the petitioner during pendency of the partition proceedings. The remedy is to seek interim relief before the court where the partition proceedings are pending and not by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If such application has already been filed, the same shall be considered and decided within ten days of certified copy of this order is placed before him. In future the petitioner would be better advised to file a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 23.1.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench