VINOD KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/644/2025 · 2025-01-21
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117857 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117857 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3619
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 644 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshuman Singh Rathore,Rajeev Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vivek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to
3. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of arrear of salary w.e.f 14.01.2013 to 31.10.2016 to the petitioner in terms of the judgment and order dated 14.02.2013 passed by the writ Court, a copy of which is annexure SA 1 to the supplementary affidavit. The writ petition of the petitioner is said to be Writ Petition No. 3392 (SS) of 2012.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench