ARUN YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA TH INTELLIGENCE OFFICER GANDHI NAGAR JAMMU
CRM(M)/117/2023 · 2025-10-07
Rajesh Sekhri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11784 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11784 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 117/2023 CrlM No.196/2023
Arun Yadav
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Vasudha Sharma, Advocate. q
vs
Union of India .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGS vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 07.10.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition. Statement is taken on record. Hence, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with connected application(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Jammu 07.10.2025 Eva
34