B.R. SONKAR @ BABU RAM SONKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PIRN. SECY. HOME AND ANR.
/6926/2017 · 2025-08-06
S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117822 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117822 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45919 Court No. - 29 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6926 of 2017 Applicant :- B.R. Sonkar @ Babu Ram Sonkar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Pirn. Secy. Home And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi P. Singh,Ramesh Babu Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. The present has been taken up in the revised list. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to address the Court though Shri Sanjay Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed in the year 2017 with the prayer to quash/set aside the impugned order dated 24.01.2017 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Unnao in Complaint Case No. 4880 of 2015, under Sections 420, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Bighapur, District Unnao.
3. The present application is pending since 2017. This Court vide order dated 25.10.2017 passed the following orders:-
"Heard Sri R.P.Singh,learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anurag Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 24.1.2017 passed by C.J.M., Unnao in Complaint Case No.4880 of 2015, Ashok Kumar Vs. Ramesh and others, under Sections 420, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Bighapur, District Unnao.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the allegation levelled against the applicant that he assisted the co-accused in getting the sale deed in question executed is absolutely false, frivolous and baseless. No offence is disclosed against the applicant. Notice on behalf of opposite party no. 1 has been accepted by learned A.G.A. Issue notice to opposite party no.2 returnable within four weeks at the address given in the application. Opposite party no.2 may file counter affidavit within four weeks. Learned A.G.A. may also file counter affidavit within the same period. Rejoinder affidavit may thereafter be filed within two weeks. List immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period before appropriate Bench.
Till the next date of listing, the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 24.1.2017 passed by the C.J.M., Unnao in the aforesaid complaint case shall remain stayed against the applicant. "
4. As per report of the C.J.M. Unnao dated 18.11.2017 notice has already been served upon respondent no. 2 through heir.
5. Even in the revised list none has appeared on behalf of the contesting parties. It appears that the applicants have lost interest to pursue the case, hence no useful purpose would be served to keep it pending on the strength of interim order for indefinite period.
6. In view of above, application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order dated 25.10.2017 is hereby vacated.
7. In case, if cause of action still survives, the applicant is at liberty to approach this Court seeking recall of this order within a period of thirty days from today.
8. A copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned forthwith to enable it to proceed with the case expeditiously in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench