Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-580-2000 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.03.2025 Teni Ram ...Appellant Vs. Anand Parkash and others ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate for the appellant. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL
, J.
(Oral)
1.
Learned counsel representing the appellant pleads no instructions. It has been noticed that the plaintiff assails the correctness of concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Courts below while dismissing his suit for possession by way of pre-emption.
2. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in prosecuting the appeal.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 18.03.2025
JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.03.20 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document