Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11780 (UTT)

POONAM CHAND AND ANR v. FOREST RANGE OFFICER,

C528/573/2024 · 2025-05-08

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3742 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 08.05.2025 C528 No.574 of 2024 With C528 No.573 of 2024 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed withdrawal applications in the Court today to withdraw the present petitions. 4. For the reasons therein, the withdrawal applications are allowed. 5. In view of the above, C482 No.574 of 2024 and C482 No.573 of 2024 stand dismissed as withdrawn and interim order dated 25.09.2024 in both the petitions is hereby stand vacated. 6. The Registry is directed to mark and paginate the same in the index of these files. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 08.05.2025 SS