HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(S) No. 334/2024 In [WP(C) No. 711/2022] CM No. 5829/2024 Karnail Singh …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ahtsham H. Bhat, Advocate. Vs Bhupinder Kumar And Others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 30.09.2025 1. The instant contempt petition arises out of an order/judgment passed by this Court on 31.03.2022, by virtue of which, the writ petition was disposed of with the directions to the official respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date copy of the order was made available to the respondents by the petitioner. 2. Since the aforesaid order was not complied with, the instant contempt petition has been preferred. 3. Today, Mr. Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the order passed by the learned Writ Court stands complied with and accordingly, he has instructions not to pursue the contempt petition any further. His statement is taken on record. 4. In the light of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and in view of the fact that the order stands complied with, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rules, if any, issued shall stand discharged. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 30.09.2025 Raj Kumar Sr. No. 24