KAMLESH KUMAR and ORS. v. STATE OF U.P.THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. NAGAR VIKAS LKO. and ORS.
WRIA/27276/2021 · 2025-08-21
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49111 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27276 of 2021 Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar And Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Mani Tripathi,Praveen Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajiv Raman Srivastava Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2 and Sri Rajiv Raman Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.3 and 4.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay regular pay scale and the service benefits to the petitioners on the post of Mali i.e. a Class-IV post.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have been engaged between the years 1988 to 1995 and have rendered substantial service, yet are not being given the regular pay scale and other
service benefits.
5. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.4 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2 and Sri Rajiv Raman Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.3 and 4 have no objection.
6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.4 then the respondent No.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is
disposed of.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. [Abdul Moin, J.]
Order Date :- 21.8.2025 cks/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench