HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 1814 of 2024 Mohammad Bin Qasim ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Pranav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.164 of 2024, under Sections 8/21C/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the entire case is false; before lodging of the FIR, according to the prosecution case, at the place of incident, the arrest memo was prepared, but it bears the FIR number, which was lodged much after the alleged recovery. 4. Learned State Counsel admits this fact. 2 5. The Court wanted to know from learned State Counsel as to how the FIR number is written in the arrest memo, which was allegedly prepared at the time of incident? She submits that as per instructions, the FIR number was recorded much later, but there is no document in support of it. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 01.07.2025 Ravi Bisht