Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117633 (ALL)

SADHU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/451/2025 · 2025-01-30

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6396-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 451 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sadhu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The submission of Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha is that only measurements have taken place for construction of 'Nala' but as of now no exercise of actually constructing the 'Nala' has been undertaken. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has instruction to inform the Court that Revenue Officials have not been contacted by the Gaon Sabha in the context of construction of any 'Nala' as alleged. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has instruction to inform the Court that petitioner is ready to offer one meter width of his land as per his convenience for construction of ' Nala' provided for the remaining part somebody else's land should be taken. 5. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with the observation/direction that the 'bhumidhari' land of the petitioner shall not be encroached upon, unless the petitioner agrees in writing to provide any land for any such purpose or it is purchased or acquired as per law. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 30.1.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench