SUSHIL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/410/2023 · 2025-08-19
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117590 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117590 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48598 Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 410 of 2023 Applicant :- Sushil Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. On being confronted that particulars of opposite party No. 2 have been indicated in the instant application despite the fact that the offence is under POCSO Act and also that victim of the case has not been arrayed in this application, learned counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application with proper prayer(s), pleadings and documents in support thereof. The aforesaid has not been opposed. In view of the above, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. Office is directed to return certified/original copies of the documents annexed with this application to the learned counsel for the applicant as per Rules in this regard. Order Date :- 19.8.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench