Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11758 (HP)

ANURADHA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/5874/2025 · 2025-04-11

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP Nos.5860 of 2025 and connected matters. Decided on: 11th April, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 5860 of 2025 Bhim Sen ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. CWP No. 5862 of 2025 Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 3. CWP No. 5874 of 2025 Anuradha ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 4. CWP No. 6056 of 2025 Rahul Jassal ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ - 2 - Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner(s): Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Ms. Archna Dutt and Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner(s) in the respective petitions. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioners, in all these writ petitions, are aggrieved of their transfers ordered pursuant to rationalization of the schools/institutions carried out by the respondents. 2. Looking to the individual grievances of the petitioners raised in their separate writ petitions, it is deemed appropriate that these grievances, which are based upon facts, be examined by the Director of Schools, Himachal Pradesh. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to prefer their individual 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 3 - representation against the impugned transfer orders to the Competent Authority within seven days. In case the presentations are so preferred, the same shall be considered and decided by the Competent Authority within next seven days. Till such time, operation of the orders impugned in these writ petitions shall remain stayed qua the petitioners. It is, however, clarified that in case the representations are not preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid period, the protection granted under this order shall stand automatically vacated. The decision so taken be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge April 11, 2025 R.Atal