IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Vishnu Singhal Chander CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) petition against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the has been allowed by the learned Rent Controller, Bhiwani vide judgment dated 28.10.2013 and the appeal filed against th judgment before the learned Appellate Authority by the tenant has been dismissed vide judgment dated 18.3.2015. present petition has been rendered infructuous as the tenanted premises has already been taken by the respondent above said fact to be true. CR-6043-2015 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6043 of Date of decision : Vishnu Singhal Versus Chander Mohan CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.K. Goel, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The petitioner/tenant has filed the present against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the Petition for Ejectment filed by the respondent/Landlord has been allowed by the learned Rent Controller, Bhiwani vide judgment dated 28.10.2013 and the appeal filed against th judgment before the learned Appellate Authority by the tenant has been dismissed vide judgment dated 18.3.2015. Learned counsel for the petitioner present petition has been rendered infructuous as the nted premises has already been taken by the respondent Learned counsel for the respondent above said fact to be true. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ivil Revision No.6043 of 2015 (O & M) Date of decision :-22.07.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate Mr. A.K. Goel, Advocate for the respondent. has filed the present revision against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below Petition for Ejectment filed by the respondent/Landlord has been allowed by the learned Rent Controller, Bhiwani vide judgment dated 28.10.2013 and the appeal filed against the said judgment before the learned Appellate Authority by the tenant has been dismissed vide judgment dated 18.3.2015. Learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the possession of the nted premises has already been taken by the respondent-landlord. Learned counsel for the respondent-landlord admitted the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.23 09.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document disposed of as infructuous July 22, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CR-6043-2015 (O & M) In view of the said position, the present petition is hereby disposed of as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 In view of the said position, the present petition is hereby application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.23 09.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document