HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3839/2004 Dolya Meena S/o Shri Ratya Meena, Aged 53 years, R/o Village Jhopra, Tehsil Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1.State of Rajasthan through the Revenue Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2.The Settlement Commissioner, Settlement Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan Jaipur. 3.The Settlement Officer, Settlement Department, Tonk (Raj.). 4.The Assistant Settlement Officer, Settlement Department, Tehsil & District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). 5. District Collector (Land Record) Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vijay Laxmi Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra with Ms. Gunjan Chawla and Mr. Manoj Kumar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/07/2025 1. The instant petition has been preferred with the following prayers: “i) issue an appropriate Writ order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby direct the Respondents to issue Settlement Parcha to the petitioner of his land as mentioned above; ii) issue an appropriate Writ order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby direct the Respondents to not to allot the land in question to any other person; iii) issue any other appropriate order or direction which the Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner; iv) thereby cost of the Writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.” (2 of 2) [CW-3839/2004] 2. By way of filing this petition, a limited prayer has been made by the petitioner for issuing directions to issue Settlement Parcha to the petitioner for the subject land. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, such direction cannot be issued by this Court if liberty is granted to the petitioner to file appropriate application for the aforesaid purpose. 4. In case any application is preferred by the petitioner before the respondents, it is expected from the respondents to decide the same strictly in accordance with law expeditiously as early as possible. 5. Needless to observe, in case any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he would be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law. 6. The present Civil Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J AMIT/10