SUNDRAVATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/430/2025 · 2025-01-21
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3714-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 430 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sundravati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Kumar Singh,Shashank Vikram Shah,Sonal Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. The private opposite parties i.e. opposite party no. 6 to 9 are alleged to have encroached the land of the petitioner. Opposite party no. 5 is the person in whose favour the son of the petitioner had executed the sale deed in respect of certain land belonging to the petitioner in the year 2002.
2. These are all private disputes which cannot be gone into under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3. The petitioner may avail the remedies, either civil or criminal, as may be prescribed in law.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench