MANZOOR AHMAD KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/481/2025 · 2025-01-17
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117543 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117543 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3154 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 481 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manzoor Ahmad Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Mani Singh,Vireandra Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Surya Mani Singh, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner was appointed on 01.04.1984 under U.P. recruitment of Dependent of Government Servant (Dying in Harness) Rules, 1974 on the post of Work Agent in the Public Works Department in Government of U.P.
3. It has further been submitted that petitioner has superannuated on 31.01.2024 and after the superannuation the PPO has also been issued on 13.06.2024 considering his service only for 24 years and 25 days rather than 39 years and 9 months from th date of his appointment.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 5 is directed to consider and decide the grievance of the petitioner in this regard in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation before respondent No. 6 within two weeks form today raising all his grievances which have been raised in the present writ petition, and in case the same is moved within time, respondent No. 5 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within six weeks thereafter by reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 17.1.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench