Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11754 (UTT)

SACHIN KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1800/2025 · 2025-10-09

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8958 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1800/2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mukesh Kaparuwan, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Paritosh Dalakoti, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Present applicant Sachin Kumar, S/o Ramnath Prasad is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 31.01.2025, bearing FIR No. 0047 of 2025, registered at P.S. Nehru Colony, District Dehradun which was lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 308(5), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS 2023 read with Section 67(D) of the Information and Technology Act. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and is languishing in jail since 09.02.2025. He also submitted that charge sheet has already been filed, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. Apart from this, he also argued that other three co-accused, namely, Pawan Kumar, Vishal Tiwari and Ravi Singh have already been granted bail by this Court and as such the applicant deserves for parity. He also submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history. 5. On the other side, Mr. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State has not disputed this fact that charge sheet has already been filed, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and other three co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. 6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the applicant is languishing in jail since 09.02.2025, and charge sheet has already been filed and 2025:UHC:8958 further there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant, and, three co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Sachin Kumar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that after being released on bail the applicant shall report to the concerned nearest police station on the first day of every month and will also provide his mobile number and also cooperate with the trial and if the prosecution finds that the applicant is indulge in any similar activity, the prosecution is free to move an application for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 09.10.2025 Parul 2025:UHC:8958